Mark C. Tanenbaum, P.A. - Personal Injury

Free Consultation - Call Us Today

More than four decades of proven experience helping victims of serious injuries

Vermont Mut. Ins. Co. v. Singleton

Vermont Mut. Ins. Co. v. Singleton, 316 S.C. 5, 446 S.E.2d 417 (S.C. 1994) Where defendant insured was acting in self-defense when he injured another, the injuries caused by hitting the other were unintended, and thus intentional act exclusion in plaintiff’s homeowner’s policy did not apply.